Climate chambers have long been used for their versatile application purposes. Whether in the market for a humidity chamber, constant climate chamber, plant growth chamber, and environmental test chamber and more, customers are likely to find their best fit. Read more about climate chambers, their types, uses, applications here for other thermal product solutions.
Sensors such as humidity sensor and more, in combination with innovative, industry leading climate control technology as found in the Peltier element, can make for a solid climate chamber capable of several tasks.
One such unique application of the Memmert HPP750eco, powered by Advanced Peltier Technology, is taking part in the thermal tolerance experiment which measures critical thermal maximum, CTmax, for bees to understand their differential sensitivity to urbanization-driven changes in body temperature and water content, as experimented on by Justin D. Burdine and Kevin E. McCluney. This research was conducted at Bowling Green State University and published by its Biological Sciences Faculty.
You can download the report here.
A fall in population or extinction can be explained by climate change and adverse effects of how land is being used today.
One could ask why it is important for scientists and researchers to know how species react to such things. Chiefly among the reasons are conservation of living organisms and maintenance of our ecosystems.
Although in such a vast world many species are studied with numerous devices, the HPP750eco plays a key role in determining how bee conservation can be kept healthily in an ecosystem.
This article explains the background and the key part where the constant climate chamber HpPP750eco comes into play.
With species population decline or, even worse, extinction, as a worst possible case, as the study explains, services provided such as pollination are at danger of being disturbed or degraded with such taxa decline.
Physiological tolerances of species as well as desiccation tolerances are important to predict how these living forms react to global change and how it impacts survival.
From the diverse bee communities, three species were studied for this experiment:
A good reason to use three types of bees was explained that they differ in size, foraging preference, sociality, and nest specificity, increasing the likelihood of detecting differential responses among species.
Righting responses were carried out with a puff of air. With its loss, the experiment indicates an endpoint when muscle functions begin to fail, and is commonly used to estimate CTmax. Bees that could move upright in a 15 second window past receiving the puff of air are considered to have lost their righting response.
Critical thermal maximum is considered here as the temperature where the righting response was lost. At this point, the bees were taken out of the climate chamber. The HPP750eco’s temperature ramping continued until all the 90 bees used in the experiment had reached their CTmax which took about two hours.
The bees were weighed, kept in air-tight vials afterwards. Bees were not fed nor given water in the temperature ramping section.